Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party, responds to the Spring Budget statement in the House of Commons

**Check
against delivery**

Jeremy
Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party,
replying to the Spring Budget statement
in the House of Commons, said: 

“Mr
Deputy Speaker, this was a Budget of utter complacency; about the state of our
economy, utter complacency about the crisis facing our public services and
complacency about the reality of daily life for millions of people in this
country.

Entirely out of touch with that reality of life
for millions.

This
morning over one million workers will have woken up not knowing whether they’ll
work today, tomorrow or next week.

Millions
more workers know their next pay packet will not be enough to make ends meet.

Millions
struggling to pay rent or mortgage; with private renters on average pay nearly
half their income in rent.

Yesterday
Mr Deputy Speaker, over three thousand people in this country will have queued
at food banks to feed themselves and their families.

Last
night Mr Deputy Speaker, over four thousand people will have slept rough on the
streets of this country.

And
the Chancellor made his boasts about a strong economy, but who is reaping the
rewards of this economy?

For
millions it is simply not working.

Not
working for the NHS, in its worst crisis ever, with funding being cut next
year.

Not
working for our children’s schools, where pupil funding continues to be cut.

Not
working for our neighbourhoods which have lost 20,000 police officers, leaving
the force in a “perilous state” in many parts of the country.

And
not working for our dedicated public servants and the people who work in them
nurses, firefighters, teachers, no pay rise for seven years for them.

And
for people with disabilities who are twice as likely to be living in poverty
and that this Government is denying them support that the courts say they need.

4
million children living in poverty which will rise by another million in coming
years.

Not
working for thousands of young people who can’t get anywhere to live, can’t get
on the housing ladder and cannot in many cases leave the parental home.

Parents
of grown-up children who would expect to be debt-free by now, but are having to
bail out student debt, or try and help with a deposit to get housing if they
can manage it
.

And
a million elderly people, and I will come onto this again, denied the social
care they need due to the £4.6 billion of cuts made by his government with the
support of the Lib Dems over the past five years.

Not
for pensioners for whom the security of the Triple Lock remains in doubt.

Mr
Deputy Speaker that is the reality facing Britain today. A government cutting
services and living standards of the many to fund and continue to fund the tax
cuts of the few.

There
are some people Mr Deputy Speaker, who are doing very well under the
Conservative government.

The
chief executives of big companies now paid 180 times more than the average
worker and taxed less.

The
big corporations making higher profits and being taxed less.

Speculators
making more and being taxed less and wealthiest families, taxed less due to
cuts in inheritance tax.

All
this adds up to £70 billion of tax giveaways over the next five years, to those
who need it the least.

This
government is the government with the wrong priorities let me give you three
examples:

The
pain of losing a child is unimaginable for most of us, but for those who do,
that pain is worsened by the stress of having to pay for their own child’s
funeral. I pay tribute to my friend the member for Swansea East for her
campaign to establish a Children’s Funeral Fund.

But
far from establishing such a fund, costing just £10 million a year, the
Government is instead cutting support for bereaved families, 3 in 4 bereaved
families would receive less. This is utterly heartless.

Despite
generous tax giveaways at the top end, there was no money either for the
160,000 people with disabilities that a court has ruled deserve a higher rate
of Personal Independence Payments. These are people with debilitating mental
health conditions dementia, schizophrenia and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The
Prime Minister came to office talking about “fighting burning injustices”.
Less than nine months later, she seems
to have forgotten all about them because none of them are being fought today.

Low
pay holds people back and it’s holding our country back.

We’re
the only major developed country in which economic growth has returned yet
workers are worse off. Wages are still below the 2008 level.

Inflation
rising, an urgent need to address the pressures on people’s incomes; massively
rising personal debts, rising energy bills and the cost of the weekly shop,
transport costs and housing costs all rising.

The
Chancellor
faced a series of tests
as to whether he would stand on the same side of the people or not. He could
have raised the minimum wage to the level of the living wage – the real living
wage, of £10 per hour as we Labour are pledged to do. It would pay for a pay
rise for six million people in this country, 62 percent of whom are women. He
failed to do that.

Since
2010, millions of public sector workers have endured a pay freeze and then a
pay cap, dedicated public servants who keep our services going have lost over 9
per cent of their real terms wages or will have done by 2020.

He
could have ended the public sector pay cap, as we are pledged to do and given a
pay rise to 5 million dedicated public servants who we all rely in day in day
out in our hospitals, our health service in general and our local government.
He failed to do that. It’s an insult to say they deserve falling living
standards when we all know those in the public sector are working harder than
ever covering the jobs of those that have gone. 

There
is a crisis too Mr Deputy Speaker in job security. Millions of workers don’t
know whether or not they’ll be working from day to day, millions of workers who
don’t know how many hours they’ll be working this week or next week, just
imagine what it’s like to try and plan your life if you don’t know what your
income is going to be from one week to the other. Because Mr Deputy Speaker
that is the reality
.

Thank
you Mr Deputy Speaker, there is nothing funny about being one of 900,000
workers on zero hours contracts, 55 percent of them women.

He
could have announced  a ban of zero hours contracts – we are pledged to
do. Again he failed.

But
zero hours contracts Mr Deputy Speaker are only the tip of the iceberg, of
4.5 million workers in Britain in insecure work, 2.3 million working variable
shift patterns, 1.1 million on temporary contracts.

We
have long argued for a clampdown on bogus self-employment but today the
Chancellor seems to have put the burden on self-employed workers instead
.

There
has to be a something for something deal, so I hope the Chancellor will bring
forward extra social security in return? One policy that Labour backs is
extending statutory maternity pay to self-employed women which is likely to
cost just £10 million per year.

Low
pay and insecure work have consequences for us all. Mr Deputy Speaker in
reality we all pay for low pay.

There
are a million working households having to claim housing benefit, just get that
figure a million working households claiming housing benefit because their
wages aren’t enough to pay the rent.  And there are 3 million working
families who simply rely on tax credits to make ends meet. This is modern
Britain.

The
most effective way of boosting wages and increasing job security as all studies
show is actually to improve collective bargaining through a trade union. Words
that the Chancellor did not use in his speech. But instead the Trade Union Act
we have will further shackle unions and perpetuate chronic low pay which
actually costs us all a lot of money through in-work benefits.  We will
promote collective bargaining and repeal the Trade Union Act.

This
is a Chancellor and a Government not on the side of the workers, not on the
side of taxpayers who pick up the bill for low pay and insecure work.

Mr
Deputy Speaker, on International Women’s Day did the Chancellor deliver a
budget that works for women?

According
to House of Commons Library analysis commissioned by my friend the member for
Rotherham, who is doing a brilliant job speaking up for women from our front
benches, 86 per cent of the savings to the Treasury has made from tax and benefit
changes have fallen on women.

Women’s
lives have been made more difficult through successive policies of this
Government.

  • Women
    struggling with more caring responsibilities due to the state of emergency in
    social care.

  • The
    WASPI women born in the 1950s who with little notice are having to face a
    crisis in retirement, they could not possibly have predicted.

  • 54,000
    women a year who are forced out of their jobs through maternity discrimination
    . They can’t afford this Government’s extortionate fees to take their employer
    to a tribunal in search of justice.

  • Women
    up and down the country who will have to wait another 60 years before the
    gender pay gap is closed.

  • The
    hundreds, hundreds of women being turned away from domestic violence shelters
    every year through lack of space or appropriate services or because they’ve
    simply been closed.

  • Mothers
    struggling, put under more pressure through cuts to universal credit and to tax
    credits.

And
as if it wasn’t bad enough to cut benefits to children whose only crime is to
be born third or fourth in a family, most shamefully Mr Deputy Speaker, as of
next month women will have to prove their third child is a product of rape if
they wish to qualify for child tax credits for that child.

I
pay tribute to my friend the member for Rotherham and the honourable member for
Glasgow Central for their campaigning on this issue . I hope the Chancellor
will reverse this cut.

There
is Mr Deputy Speaker, a housing crisis in this country – a crisis of supply and
of affordability.

Since
2010, housebuilding has fallen to its lowest rate in peacetime since the 1920s.
The building of social homes for rent is at its lowest level for a quarter of a
century.

Did
he empower councils to tackle the housing crisis by allowing them to borrow to
build council housing as we are pledged to do? No.

Have
they replaced council houses sold under right-to-buy as they promised? No, just
one-in-six have been replaced.

And
was there any commitment to return to councils the £800 million right-to-buy
proceeds the Treasury has taken back, which would build  twelve thousand
homes? No.

Did
he scrap the unfair bedroom tax as we are pledged to do? No.

Did
he reverse housing benefit cuts that would take support away from ten thousand
young people? Despite opposition from Shelter, Crisis and Centrepoint, which
even the honourable member for Enfield Southgate correctly described as
“catastrophic”.

Last
week the Institute for Government said there were “clear warning signs” of the
damaging impact of the Government’s cuts on schools, prisons, health and social
care.

This
government has taken a sledgehammer to public services in recent years, the
Chancellor now expects praise for patching up a small part of the damage.

The
Budget didn’t provide the funding necessary now for the crisis in our NHS –
which the BMA reckons needs an extra £10 billion.

It
didn’t provide the funding necessary to end the state of emergency in social
care now which needs £2 billion a year just to plug the gaps according to the
King’s Fund.

That
is not met by £2 billion over three years. The money is needed now. More than a
million people, mainly older people, desperate for social care still can’t get
it. The money ought to be made available now.

Because
this government ducks really tough choices, like asking corporations to pay a
little bit more in tax.

Not
every local authority can just text Nick and get the deal they want.

And
other council services are suffering as well:

Our
communities are stronger when we have good libraries, and they are evaluable
obviously to children but for the entire community. 67 closed last year because
of local government underfunding.

700
Sure Start centres closed because of lack of funding for local authorities.
Denying the life chances that a Labour government delivered to them with the
opening of Sure Start centres in the 90’s. And 600 youth centres have closed as
well.

These
painful decisions being taken by councils not because they want to do it, but
just because they don’t have enough money even to keep essential services
running because of the slashing of their budgets, year on year. And it goes on,
it affects our communities and our lives in so many ways.

Last
year councils proposed to sell-off of school playing fields the equivalent of
500 football pitches. 500 pitches not available for young people to indulge in
sport. It’s our duty as a community surely, to ensure all our young people
wherever they live have a decent chance to grow up with a library, with a
playing field, with a Sure Start centre. It’s not a lot to ask.

The
Chancellor boasts Mr Deputy Speaker of a strong economy. but abandoned the
targets of the previous Chancellor so let’s give a more realistic context to
today’s figures: the deficit that was going to be eradicated in 2015 – you’ll
remember the “long term economic plan”. The debt that was going to peak at 80%
of GDP and then start falling.

Our
economy is not prepared for Brexit. We still have an economy suffering from
underinvestment and an over-reliance on consumer spending and wholly
unsustainable levels of personal and household debt.

Investment
must be evenly spread around our country and despite the announcements today,
London continues to receive six times as much investment as the North East.

And
so that’s why Labour is backing a ‘fair funding formula for investment’ so that
every area gets it’s fair share of capital spending. What’s been announced
today doesn’t achieve that. You can’t build a ‘Northern powerhouse’ or a
‘Midlands Engine’ if investment does not follow the sound-bites.

Our
country currently spends 1.7% on Research & Development which is  well
below the OECD average. The strongest economies spend over 3%.

In
the immediate term, and the Chancellor didn’t have much to say about this, he
must also focus his attentions on the precarious future of skilled workers jobs
at Vauxhall in Ellesmere Port and Luton Ellesmere and at Ford in Bridgend.

It
would give export businesses more confidence if the government clearly
committed to negotiating for tariff- and impediment-free access to the single
market and dropped this reckless threat of turning Britain into a tax haven on
the shores of Europe.

One
of the biggest challenges facing our country Mr Deputy Speaker, is
environmental; it’s climate change. This Government is failing to lead, failing
to drive a mission-led industrial strategy as our own Business Select Committee
has recommended.

The
Chancellor failed to make energy efficiency a national infrastructure priority.
No commitment to establishing a zero carbon standards on new buildings. And
unclear about investments in public transport that will definitely reduce
pollution.  The poor air quality is appalling.  It’s killing
thousands of people in this country. Its taking away the life chances of many
children growing up alongside polluted roads. The good work being done by
Labour’s London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the good work being done by the Welsh Labour
Government has rightly recognised this as an ‘urgent public health crisis’,
particularly for children. We have to deal with this crises and deal with it
urgently.

There
cannot be Mr Deputy Speaker, an industrial strategy or productivity gains
unless there’s serious investment in skills.

Adult
skills training cut by 54 per cent, further education budget by 14 per cent the
small amounts committed today are long overdue but woefully insufficient. Over
the coming years the schools budget is being cut by 8 per cent. Does the
Chancellor really want fewer teachers and teaching assistants, even larger
classes , shorter school days? Which is it?

I
agree with the Prime minister that every child deserves a decent education.
Every community deserves decent schools. You do it by working with those
communities to provide those schools, not plonking into them selective schools
which are not being demanded by those communities.

The
money announced by the Prime Minister yesterday for new grammar schools is
frankly a vanity project. Cancel this gimmick, reject selection and segregation
and why not honour their own 2015 manifesto pledge to protect per pupil funding
which is clearly not happening.

This
is a Budget that lacks ambition for Britain and lacks fairness.

It
demonstrates again the appalling priorities of this Government, another year of
tax breaks for the few, public service cuts for the many.

When
she took office, the Prime Minister said “If you’re one of those families, if
you’re just managing, I want to address you directly”.

This
Budget did not address them; it failed them.

This
Budget has done nothing to tackle low pay; nothing to solve the state of
emergency that persists for so many people demanding and needing health and
social care now; and nothing to make a fair economy that truly works for
everyone.

It’s
built on unfairness and it’s built on failure to tackle unfairness in our
society.

Ends




John McDonnell responding to the Budget

John McDonnell MP, Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, responding to the
Budget, said:

“Philip Hammond has used his first Budget to claw £2 billion in
tax on those self-employed who are on low and middle incomes. But he continued
to boast about the £70 billion worth of tax giveaways at the top announced by
his predecessor.

“Labour will oppose this unfair £2 billion sole traders tax on the
self-employed low and middle earners. 

“Rather than provide the funding that would end a social care
crisis in which 1 million vulnerable people go without adequate care, or
calling an end to the state of emergency in our NHS, the Tories are doing next
to nothing and don’t seem to recognise the scale of the crisis they have
created.

“The Tory rigged economy continues for households in our country,
who face being £1,800 worse off by the end of the forecast period, and if you
are on the National Living Wage by the end of this parliament you face a 25p
per hour cut.

“This Budget does not address the problems created by seven years
of Tory failure, and it has failed the fairness test for women who will be hit by
a cuts in public services, and the national living wage.

“Instead of equipping our country for Brexit, he is building our
economy on sand, and the little he has announced today will mean we are less
prepared for the challenges we face outside of the EU.”

Ends




OBR figures show SNP oil assertions were “a tissue of lies”

8 Mar 2017

07 May 2011 MSP pictured in the garden lobby during the MSP registration session. Pic - Andrew Cowan/Scottish Parliament

The OBR has today cut its forecast for oil and gas receipts in its latest publication today.

Prior to the 2014 independence referendum, the SNP claimed it would receive revenues of up to £11.8 billion in 2017-18.

The OBR today estimates actual revenues for that year at £0.9 billion.

Estimated revenues for all the next four years have been revised down since the OBR’s last report in November.

Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Murdo Fraser said: 

“These are troubling figures which only serve to reinforce the current fragility of Scotland’s oil and gas sector – and shows why the support announced by the UK Government today is so necessary.

“It also throws the SNP’s deception on oil prior to the independence referendum into stark relief.

“The SNP knew their oil forecasts were based on fantasy figures but they tried to fool people anyway. Their oil con has now been exposed for the tissue of lies it was.

“The head of Nicola Sturgeon’s Growth Commission, Andrew Wilson, has admitted this week that oil receipts were part of their spending plans, and not a bonus.

“Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney have gone into hiding over this scandal.

“They must now admit they were wrong, and spell out how they would fill Scotland’s £15bn deficit in the event we voted for independence.”


http://cdn.budgetresponsibility.org.uk/March2017EFO-231.pdf




£350m budget bonanza for Scotland means no need for SNP tax hikes

8 Mar 2017

ruth4

The additional £350 million coming to Scotland as a result of today’s budget means the SNP does not need to hike people’s taxes, the Scottish Conservatives have said.

Thanks to decisions made by Chancellor Philip Hammond, Scotland will receive the extra cash through Barnett Consequentials, including an additional £100 million for this coming year alone.

That – together with extra funds finance secretary Derek Mackay found in his own budget dealings totalling more than £230 million – means the Scottish Government has significantly more money for 2017/18 than it previously thought.

Shadow finance secretary Murdo Fraser said that means there’s now no need for the SNP to make Scotland the highest-taxed part of the UK, and should relieve some of its cuts to public services too.

As part of today’s budget, Mr Hammond confirmed the personal allowance would increase to £12,500, which takes 113,000 people out of tax altogether in Scotland.

Fuel duty will be frozen for the seventh year on the trot, which could save the average driver £10 every time they fill up at the pump.

And more support was announced for the north east with the creation of an expert group to look at helping the oil and gas industry.

Scottish Conservative shadow finance secretary Murdo Fraser said:

“The Chancellor has struck the right balance in this budget – keeping money in reserve as we prepare to leave the EU, but at the same time handing a boost to the economy.

“For Scotland alone, his plans will deliver an extra £350 million for the SNP government to spend as it wishes over the coming years.

“The SNP’s double dose of local government cuts and income tax changes to penalise middle-earners is now utterly without justification.

“The simple truth is that, if it was focused on the day job, the SNP wouldn’t need to make Scotland the highest-taxed part of the UK.

“With even more spending power now at its disposal, a competent government could give taxpayers a break and find the cash to support social care and schools across Scotland.

“The question facing the SNP is this – if Philip Hammond can support public services while protecting family pay packets, why can’t Derek Mackay?”

Below are additional comments from Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson, who was speaking at a Scottish Property Federation conference this afternoon:

“My message to the Scottish Government is this.

“As I said earlier, despite the Chancellor’s cautious approach on spending, his budget this afternoon means that the Scottish Government now has £350 million extra to spend over the coming years.

“That includes £100 million to spend in the next financial year alone.

“This is extra cash that the SNP had not planned for in its budget.

“With this extra money, the finance secretary’s claim that council cuts and tax rises are necessary has therefore been substantially eroded.

“So I hope that the SNP will use this extra resource to support councils which require it, and give taxpayers and businesses a break.

“We simply do not need to send out the message that higher taxes are necessary in Scotland.

“I urge the SNP to think again.”




Press release: Directors who manipulated accounts disqualified

An Insolvency Service investigation found that Mr Dhillon caused, and Ms Dhillon allowed, the companies to operate in manner which lacked probity, as a result of which a bank suffered a loss totalling £31.767m.

Mr and Ms Dhillon were directors of Dhillon hotels Limited, Liongate Hotel Limited, Crown Hotel (Amersham) Limited, which entered administration on 20 September 2012 and PHB Realisations 2013 Limited (formerly Paragon Hotel (Birmingham) Limited) and Paragon Birmingham Limited which entered administration on 21 September 2012. The companies had operated the following hotels:

  • The Olde Bell Coaching Inn, High Street, Hurley-on-Thames
  • The Lionsgate Hotel, Hampton Court Road, Kingston-upon-Thames
  • The Crown Inn, High Street, Amersham
  • The Paragon Hotel, Alcester Road, Birmingham
  • with Paragon Hotel (Birmingham) Limited being a holding company

Mr and Ms Dhillon operated a group of hotels, all of which were subject to the same bank lending facility and cross guarantees. The investigation found the Dhillon’s utilised the various companies for personal expenditures which were attributed by the group accounting department to director loans, these directors being Mr and Ms Dhillon.

The lending facility was subject to strict covenants regarding the ratio of turnover to lending/interest. The bank was provided with regular management accounts which showed that the covenants were being met. These were inaccurate constructions solely for that purpose. Accounts were then filed at Companies House which were consistent with management accounts presented to the bank (in the form of year-end adjustments within the accounting system). These adjustments had the effect of obscuring personal expenditure and inflating the value of assets, thereby inverting and obscuring the true position.

In tandem with these erroneous adjustments, a large property (Paragon Hotel in Birmingham) was presented, from 2009, as being about to be sold to an unconnected third party. This sale was asserted to be subject to delays, during which time nearly £13m more was loaned against the security it was purported to provide. The truth was the supposed purchaser had entered Administration in 2009. The property was ultimately sold for £3m by the office holders in 2013.

The Insolvency Service investigation also found, and Mr and Ms Dhillon accepted, that:

  • the bank was knowingly provided with management accounts which presented an inaccurate picture of the true financial and trading position of each company and the Companies together
  • the accounting system used by the companies was knowingly manipulated through the use of year end adjustments to have the appearance of consistency with management accounts presented to the Bank in relation to each company and the Companies together
  • the bank was falsely informed that Paragon Birmingham Limited was continuing the process of selling the Paragon Hotel at a price of circa £18m when the proposed purchaser had entered Administration on 7 December 2009 and no such sale was possible, probable or likely
  • the overdraft increased from £5.5m on 24 March 2009 to £18.29m on 8 May 2012
  • the bank continued to provide moneys to the Companies by way of extended overdraft facilities on the basis of the proposed sale of The Paragon Hotel
  • the accounting records maintained on behalf each company were not accurate and complete
  • the financial statements lodged at Companies House therefore could not be accurate

At Administration the bank was owed £48.304m with secured assets being realised/valued at £16,537m, resulting in an estimated shortfall of £31.767m

Commenting on the disqualification, Cheryl Lambert, Chief Investigator at the Insolvency Service, said:

Directors have a duty to ensure that the procedures they construct and oversee comply with the law. Directors who do not comply with this basic obligation can expect to be investigated by the Insolvency Service and enforcement action taken to remove them from the market place.

In this case, Mr Dhillon was responsible for the construction of a long term and complex web of lies, by manipulating the internal financial systems of a group of companies. Additionally, the sale of a very large asset was claimed to be occurring resulting in almost £13m of further lending being made, which were then used within their empire of companies and which allowed the Dhillons to continue to benefit from their continued operation.

In court proceedings relating to Mr Dhillon’s business affairs a judge branded him as a man who “regards truth as a merely optional extra when doing business.” Following the Insolvency Service’s investigation I can only agree with that conclusion.

Ms Dhillon took no action to prevent the long term implementation of that deceit, whilst benefiting from the continued operation of the companies and the increased funds overdraft extensions.

This activity goes to the very core and basis of the economic system, with Mr Dhillon knowingly creating a scheme to obscure his activities and the real position in relation to the company’s trading and solvency.

Taking action against Ms Dhillon is a warning to all directors to seriously consider, and ensure they perform their duties and obligations and not hide behind the corporate veil or claim ignorance of acts, whilst accepting the rewards and benefits of corporate trading.

Notes to editors

Dhillon Hotels Ltd (CRO 02368567) was incorporated on 5 April 1989. Its registered office was 118 Piccadilly, Mayfair, London, W1J 7NW and traded The Olde Bell Coaching Inn, High Street, Hurley-on-Thames.

Lionsgate Hotel (Amersham) Ltd (CRO 04173719) was incorporated on 6 March 2001. Its registered office was 118 Piccadilly, Mayfair, London, W1J 7NW and traded The Lionsgate Hotel, Hampton Court Road, Kingston-upon-Thames.

Crown Hotel (Amersham) Ltd (CRO 05195352) was incorporated on 2 August 2004. Its registered office was 118 Piccadilly, Mayfair, London, W1J 7NW and traded The Crown Inn, High Street, Amersham.

PHB Realisations 2013 Ltd (CRO 05834739) was incorporated on 1 June 2006 as Paragon Hotel Birmingham Ltd and changed its name on 17 May 2013. Its registered office was 118 Piccadilly, Mayfair, London, W1J 7NW and traded The Paragon Hotel, Alcester Road, Birmingham.

Paragon Birmingham Ltd (CRO 05880199) was incorporated on 18 July 2006. Its registered office was 118 Piccadilly, Mayfair, London, W1J 7NW. Paragon Birmingham Limited operated as holding company.

Dhillon Hotels Ltd, Lionsgate Hotel Ltd and Crown Hotel (Amersham) Ltd were placed into Administration on 20 September 2012.

PHB Realisation 2013 Ltd (formerly Paragon Hotel (Birmingham) Ltd and Paragon Birmingham Ltd were placed into Administration on 21 September 2012.

Sarah Megan Rayment and Anthony David Nygate, BDO LLP, 55 Baker Street, London W1U 7EU were appointed joint Administrators of all five companies.

Sarina Thiara Dhillon is of 19A Warrington Crescent London W9 1ED.

Novtej Singh Dhillon now resides 8b Albert Palace, Kensington, London W8 5PD and was formerly of the 16e Portland Road London W11 4LA.

The Secretary of State accepted an undertaking from Samina Thiara Dhillon on 23 December 2016. The disqualification commences on 13 January 2017.

The Secretary of State accepted an undertaking from Novtej Singh Dhillon on 24 January 2017. The disqualification commenced on 14 February 2017

A disqualification order has the effect that without specific permission of a court, a person with a disqualification cannot:

  • act as a director of a company
  • take part, directly or indirectly, in the promotion, formation or management of a company or limited liability partnership
  • be a receiver of a company’s property

Disqualification undertakings are the administrative equivalent of a disqualification order but do not involve court proceedings. Persons subject to a disqualification order are bound by a range of other restrictions.

The Insolvency Service, an executive agency sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), administers the insolvency regime, and aims to deliver and promote a range of investigation and enforcement activities both civil and criminal in nature, to support fair and open markets. We do this by effectively enforcing the statutory company and insolvency regimes, maintaining public confidence in those regimes and reducing the harm caused to victims of fraudulent activity and to the business community, including dealing with the disqualification of directors in corporate failures.

BEIS’ mission is to build a dynamic and competitive UK economy that works for all, in particular by creating the conditions for business success and promoting an open global economy. The Criminal Investigations and Prosecutions team contributes to this aim by taking action to deter fraud and to regulate the market. They investigate and prosecute a range of offences, primarily relating to personal or company insolvencies.

The agency also authorises and regulates the insolvency profession, assesses and pays statutory entitlement to redundancy payments when an employer cannot or will not pay employees, provides banking and investment services for bankruptcy and liquidation estate funds and advises ministers and other government departments on insolvency law and practice.

Further information about the work of the Insolvency Service, and how to complain about financial misconduct, is available.

All public enquiries concerning the affairs of the company should be made to: Cheryl Lambert, Chief Investigator, Investigations and Enforcement Services, The Insolvency Service, 3rd Floor, Abbey Orchard Street, London SW1P 2HT. Tel: 0207 596 6117. Email: Cheryl.Lambert@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk.

Media enquiries for this press release – 020 7674 6910 or 020 7596 6187

You can also follow the Insolvency Service on: