Speech: Tackling obesity is a shared responsibility for society

As Health Secretary, there’s some guiding principles I try to follow, like: always start with the patients, follow the evidence, listen to the experts, and then make decisions that do the most good ‒ not the ones that are most politically expedient.

Although, as President Roosevelt once said: “There’s as many opinions as there are experts.”

So it’s great to be here with so many experts today, to discuss the modern challenge of obesity.

I want to start by paying tribute to the work of this APPG, who have done so much to raise the issue, and stand testament to the fact obesity is one of the biggest health challenges we face as a society. Here in Britain, and across the world.

Now, for the first time, obesity is thought to be a bigger problem, globally, than hunger.

Of course, the growing availability of food around the world is a good thing, and is something humanity has sought to achieve throughout history. But abundance of food brings new challenges.

After all, as humans we are predisposed to eat more than we need, as our evolution has designed us to stock up in abundance for leaner times ahead.

Each and every one of us, in rich nations, faces this clash of evolutionary biology and modern life every day. And it’s worth noting that as nations grow richer, it’s the poorest in them who are the most prone to obesity.

So tackling obesity means tackling social, environmental, physical and psychological pressures, and giving people the capability they need to eat healthily.

And the evidence shows that for a whole host of reasons, some people are more susceptible to obesity than others.

The question I want to address today, and which this APPG is rightly considering, is how to address obesity, and what is the role for government, for business, for civil society and for each of us as citizens. Because tackling obesity is a shared responsibility for society.

This government has taken a global lead in our obesity strategy, chapters 1 and 2, with our ambitious targets to halve childhood obesity by 2030. Our strategy sets out the scale of the problem, and also what we’re doing to tackle it.

We’re cutting sugar in soft drinks. The sugar levy has removed the equivalent of 90 million kilograms of sugar since it was introduced in 2016, proving that population-wide measures work, and are necessary, alongside promoting healthier behaviours and empowering individuals to make better choices.

We’re tackling everything from reformulation of foods, to calorie labelling in restaurants, to restricting advertising and promotion of junk food, to encouraging schools to adopt a ‘daily mile’ so children are more active.

We’re doubling the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme over the next 5 years, supporting low-calorie diets for obese people with type 2 diabetes.

Just this weekend we announced our latest measures, to curb retailers fuelling promotion of unhealthy foods.

On top of our obesity strategy, our Long Term Plan for the NHS sets out how we’re driving the obesity strategy across the health service.

GPs are ‘making every contact count’ in identifying and supporting overweight children and adults manage their weight.

Hospitals will increasingly support patients whose obesity leaves them hospitalised, with a huge burden of cost on the NHS.

We’ll learn from anywhere, so we’ve studied the success of cities like Amsterdam and their ‘whole systems approach’ to reducing childhood obesity. And I want us to keep learning from the latest evidence and new approaches from around the world.

The only way we’re going to solve the growing, global challenge of obesity is if everyone plays their part.

The state has a vital role to play in reducing the environmental factors that contribute to obesity and protecting vulnerable children. We will play our part.

Local government has an important role supporting healthier high streets through better planning decisions, through their role in education, providing equipment for exercise, helping protect and create more open spaces for children to play and be active.

The health service itself has a vital ‒ and growing ‒ role to play in preventing obesity and helping people achieve a healthy weight.

Public Health England are world leaders in gathering and analysing data so we can make the correct, evidence-led, decisions.

Thanks to their work on identifying the role of sugar in obesity, we corrected the decades old mistake of focusing too much on saturated fat.

They will have a crucial role to play in developing the next phase of data-driven public health programmes using predictive prevention.

Companies large and small have a role to play in reformulating their products. I welcome action that’s been taken so far, I’m excited by some of the coming science, and I want to see more action by the food industry.

Civil society has a role to play too in supporting people to stay healthy. I want to pay tribute to individuals with big voices like Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and Jamie Oliver, who use their influence to try to change habits, norms and assumptions, as well as trying to change government policy. Because changing behaviour means changing norms, as well as the formal rules we set in this building.

Finally, each of us, as individuals, we have a role to play and must take responsibility for our own health. Because even with the best efforts of the state and society, we can’t solve the obesity challenge without individuals taking personal responsibility too: this is a shared responsibility.

We’re putting in a record £20.5 billion extra a year into the NHS – the longest and largest cash settlement in its history – as we transform the health service over the next decade.

To rise to the challenges of today and seize the opportunities of the future, we’re implementing the new NHS Long Term Plan on the principle that prevention is better than cure.

It’s better for people if we prevent them becoming patients in the first place. It’s better for the NHS if they help people stay healthy rather than treating them only when they fall ill. And it’s better for taxpayers, and the nation, if we build a sustainable health system that will be there, for all of us, in years to come. The prevention agenda means yes, making changes only government can make.

That same prevention agenda means we need to do more to support people to take care of themselves, to keep themselves healthy ‒ to empower people with the capability and expectation that they have an important role to play too.

I want to take a moment to set out the approach I take to these sorts of interventions.

I am no fan of nanny state interventions that treat everyone the same, or punish the masses for the problems of a minority.

The blanket public health approach we needed in an age of contagious diseases is still needed now in some areas. But the modern public health problems of largely non-communicable diseases need a different attitude, and a much more targeted approach.

No organisation wanting to tackle a problem as big as obesity would use the same approach for everyone, and target the whole population the same. After all, food is safe, obviously critical, as part of a balanced diet. Even a fatty cut of delicious steak is healthy in moderation.

There is huge, overwhelming, support for action to tackle obesity. Let’s not lose that support with too much of a blanket approach.

Take alcohol. For 95% of people, the alcohol we drink is perfectly safe and normal. I like a pint or the odd glass of wine, and I know I speak for most of my audience and certainly the vast majority of my colleagues too. Let’s not punish the masses for perfectly healthy behaviour.

But for the 5% who drink around a third of all the alcohol consumed, who too often end up hospitalised and seriously ill because of it, we need much more serious intervention.

The same attitude is needed across public health: lots more targeting, less intervention for the healthy, more intervention for those who need it. And the exciting thing is, we have a radically expanding toolkit at our disposal.

The approach we take with a 60-year-old man, who’s set in his ways, must be different to the approach we take with a young, pregnant mother trying to get healthy for the sake of her baby.

And in the future, as we unlock our genetic codes and adopt new technologies like artificial intelligence, we can be yet more targeted too. We can even get ahead of the problem, supporting people who are likely to have problems with help and nutritional support.

With the right attitude and technology, we can lead the world with predictive prevention and personalised health services.

This approach can only work if we see tackling obesity as a shared responsibility. Diet and physical activity ‒ too much and too little ‒ are, by far and away, the 2 biggest factors that contribute to obesity. And the best solutions are in the vast majority of cases not medicinal, but behavioural.

The role of the health service is just as much to prescribe behaviour change as it is to prescribe drugs. This is now widely accepted, but needs to be embedded in the way we organise our NHS.

Nutritional advice, counselling, activity and exercise must be just as much a part of the toolkit of the NHS as drugs. This insight is behind our strong support for social prescribing, embedded in our NHS Long Term Plan.

This agenda is so important we’re going to introduce more than 1,000 trained social prescribing link workers within the next 2 years, to help refer over 900,000 people ‒ because the evidence shows that social prescribing, like activity or an exercise classes, can lead to the same or better outcomes than drugs.

I also strongly believe that because many of those social cures are free, they don’t have multi-million dollar marketing budgets behind them. So it’s the job of those of us in government to compensate and lean in ‒ supporting training and developing the evidence base for social prescribing.

And that brings me to the definitional issue. I understand the reasons why some have called for obesity to be reclassified as a disease. People rightly want to lessen the stigma and increase support for people with obesity.

I agree with both of those goals. I’ve listened to the various views within the medical system, and I’ve taken advice. And I’m a staunch supporter of action to tackle obesity.

But I think reclassifying obesity isn’t the way to do it. In trying to reduce one stigma, we risk creating another. I worry that calling obesity a disease, like cancer, risks being counter-productive and sending out the wrong message.

And because obesity is a condition born of human behaviour, my biggest worry is that if people with obesity are told they have a disease, it risks robbing them of agency and the incentive to change behaviour.

We risk taking away their power, where we must do everything we can to support and empower and expect them to change their lives through healthier choices.

Instead of helping them, we make them feel helpless. I don’t think that helps. Is that what we want? More drugs and medical solutions encouraging life-long dependency on prescriptions and pills? No: we should have high expectations and support people to meet them.

Now, I know there’s a healthy debate around this, and I welcome today’s event and a frank and public discussion, because anything we can do to increase the focus on and reduce the stigma around obesity is hugely welcome. We share the same goal: to reduce obesity and help people live healthier lives.

But, while we shouldn’t call obesity a disease, we should redouble our efforts to act. And perhaps nowhere is the prevention agenda more important than childhood obesity.

Almost a quarter of 4 and 5 year-olds are now overweight or obese, and that rises to a third by the time children are 11.

We must prevent overweight kids from becoming obese adults. And for children, I do believe in the strongest government interventions.

Let’s help families and empower parents to lead healthier and more active lives, for the sake of the children. Let’s make Britain the best place for children to grow up, where a child’s health and life chances aren’t curtailed by obesity before they even start secondary school. Let’s treat healthy adults like healthy adults, and treat children like children.

Prevention will be embedded into every part of the NHS over the next decade. State, society, business and people. We each have our part to play.

We have a shared responsibility to work together to tackle obesity and build the health system and society we all want to see.




Press release: Housing Minister confirms funding for councils to crack down on rogue landlords

  • More than 50 councils to benefit from nearly £2.4 million to ramp up action against the minority of irresponsible landlords who make tenants’ lives a misery
  • Money to be used to boost short-term staffing and create new digital tools to help councils better protect tenants
  • Measures build on action taken by government to protect renters and drive up standards across the sector

More than 50 councils across the country will share nearly £2.4 million of extra funding to crack down on rogue landlords, Housing Minister Heather Wheeler has announced today (14 January 2019).

Whilst the majority of landlords provide decent homes for their tenants, the cash boost will enable local councils to step up action against the small minority who continue to flout the law and force vulnerable tenants such as young families to live in inadequate or unsafe housing.

Councils across the country from Allerdale to Watford will receive a share of the funding for projects to take tougher action against unscrupulous landlords.

Among the councils to benefit from the funding are:

  • Walsall – to improve cross-agency enforcement work, including the innovative use of drones and thermal mapping to identify problem properties

  • Lancaster – to create a training programme for existing enforcement staff across the Lancashire region

  • Greater London Authority (GLA) and Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) – allocated over £330,000 between them to carry out coordinated work to tackle rogue landlords who operate across multiple local authorities in their regions

Housing Minister Heather Wheeler MP said:

Everyone has the right to live in a home that is safe and secure, and it is vital we crack down on the small minority of landlords who are not giving their tenants this security.

This extra funding will further boost councils’ ability to root out rogue landlords and ensure that poor-quality homes in the area are improved, making the housing market fairer for everyone.

The government has already equipped local authorities with strong powers to tackle criminal landlords, ranging from fines to outright bans for the worst offenders.

The new funding will be used to support a range of projects that councils have said will help them to ramp up action against criminal landlords – for example, to build relationships with external organisations such as the emergency services, legal services and local housing advocates.

Councils may also decide to support tenants to take action against poor standards through rent repayment orders, or develop digital solutions, helping officers to report back and make decisions quicker.

Councils that receive funding will be encouraged to share best practice and examples of innovative approaches, to help improve enforcement in other areas.

This builds on ongoing government action to drive up standards in the private rented sector – ensuring millions of hard-working tenants can live in the homes they deserve and creating a housing market that works for everyone.

There are 4.7 million households in the private rented sector in England, with recent statistics showing that 82% of private renters are satisfied with their accommodation.

The fund will help councils to take on the most common challenges that stand in the way of tackling poor standards in the private rented sector, including:

  • the need for better information – on housing stock and on landlords and agents operating in their areas
  • data sharing between authorities and agencies – identifying and bringing together different data sets to enable better enforcement targeting
  • internal ‘ways of working’ – improving housing-specific legal expertise, in-house communication between teams, and tools and strategies to effectively implement policy
  • innovative software – for enforcement officers to record their findings, gather evidence and streamline the enforcement process.



Speech: 62nd Executive Council meeting of the OPCW

Thank you Madam Chair,

First, a big welcome to Ambassador Melono who takes up the role of Deputy Director General. You are well qualified for this key post at a vital time, and deserve strong support from all of us.

We, the States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention, have all committed to ‘exclude completely the possibility of the use of chemical weapons’. In order to achieve this the technical provisions of the Convention need to be relevant and up to date.

That was why our predecessors set out very clearly – in Article 15, paragraph five of the Convention – a process for considering technical changes to the Annexes to the Convention, including the Annex on Chemicals, commonly known as the ‘Schedules’. States Parties recognised from the outset that updates to the Annexes may be needed to ensure the viability and effectiveness of the Convention.

Which brings us to the substance of our meeting today, namely the joint proposal from the Netherlands, Canada and the USA to add two closely related families of chemicals to Schedule 1A of the Convention. We commend the thorough and objective review of the proposal by Technical Secretariat which confirms that:

  • first: the criteria for including toxic chemicals on Schedule 1A have been met
  • second: the procedural requirements of the Convention have been followed
  • and third: that the proposal is consistent with the advice of the Scientific Advisory Board

We have discussed the joint proposal with the co-sponsors and I want to state very clearly that the UK fully supports it. The proposal covers the chemical weapon that was used in my country less than a year ago. It was intended to cause death and tragically it did so. The reports from the Technical Assistance Visits following the appalling events in Salisbury and Amesbury not only confirmed the identity of the substance involved, but also its high toxicity. The two closely related families of chemicals have no identified legitimate civilian use.

This Council is required to examine the proposal and notify our recommendation to all States Parties within 90 days. That deadline falls today. It is imperative that the chemical weapon used in Salisbury, together with the most closely related toxic chemicals, be included in Schedule 1A. Acting now will demonstrate the resolve of States Parties to address new types of chemical warfare agents and deter further use. I call on other Council members to support the draft decision in front of us.

Thank you Chair.




News story: What we do at the DBS – a video feature

placeholder

The below video, which details some of the work completed by the Disclosure and Barring Service, has been uploaded to our YouTube channel.

The video details the different levels of DBS check, what type of information may be used to carry out these checks and the importance of safeguarding.

The video can be found here.

Published 14 January 2019




Press release: £70 million Homes England funding brings thousands of new homes to Northamptonshire

Around 8,500 new houses will be built in Northamptonshire following a funding injection from Homes England, the government’s housing delivery agency.

Located within an hour of London and Birmingham and inside the Cambridge/Oxford corridor, the two new residential schemes will help create around 3,000 jobs as well as schools, leisure and commercial space.

The developments in Kettering and Wellingborough have been made possible with a £70 million loan from Homes England.

The schemes have a projected combined value of £2.5 billion over their lifetime, which is estimated to be 20 years.

The agency has agreed the loan as part of its £4.5 billion Home Building Fund, which provides development and infrastructure finance to home builders. The investment will be used to create roads, utilities and other works to enable the delivery of homes at Kettering and at phase one of the site at Wellingborough.

Kit Malthouse, Minister of State for Housing said:

“I am delighted to hear shovels are already in the ground as builders set about delivering 8,500 much-needed homes so more people can realise their home-owning dream.

“We are making the housing market work, and Homes England’s £70m loan will unlock the development so we can invest in the properties our country needs.”

Speaking of Homes England’s role in delivering the sites, Sir Edward Lister, Chairman of Homes England said:

“We’re working with partners across the country to ensure land is available to build more new homes where they’re most needed.

“Providing infrastructure upfront is key to unlocking significant housing growth and Homes England’s investment in Kettering and Wellingborough will enable two major housing projects to be delivered after many years of delay.”

Speaking on behalf of the scheme’s delivery partners, Long Harbour, Midtown Capital and Buccleuch Property, Aldred Drummond of Long Harbour added:

“The delivery partners have combined our respective expertise in planning, development, construction and finance to optimise the potential of these sites, providing much-needed homes and jobs in this superbly connected location.

“Both schemes will benefit from beautifully designed public areas and landscape, taking inspiration from the surrounding countryside.

“We are delighted that our investment, supported by Homes England, will have a positive impact on the future prosperity of this wonderful part of England.”

ENDS

For more information contact Sarah Foulkes, Communications Officer at Homes England. Tel: 0161 200 6130/ 07967 782 162 or email sarah.foulkes@homesengland.gov.uk