Tag Archives: China

image_pdfimage_print

Grading of beach water quality released

     The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) today (March 22) released the latest grading of water quality for eight gazetted beaches that are open for swimming.

     Seven beaches were rated as Good (Grade 1) and one as Fair (Grade 2).

Grade 1 beaches are:             

Big Wave Bay Beach Repulse Bay Beach
Clear Water Bay Second Beach Silver Mine Bay Beach    
Deep Water Bay Beach Stanley Main Beach
Golden Beach  
 
Grade 2 beach is:
Silverstrand Beach  
 
     Compared with the grading released last week, Silverstrand Beach has been changed from Grade 1 to Grade 2.

     “The changes are generally within the normal range of fluctuation of the bacteriological water quality of the beaches,” an EPD spokesman said.

     Under the present grading system, beaches are classified into four grades, namely Good (Grade 1), Fair (Grade 2), Poor (Grade 3) and Very Poor (Grade 4), according to the level of E. coli in the water. Grades are calculated on the basis of the geometric mean of the E. coli counts on the five most recent sampling occasions.

     While the ratings represent the general water quality at the beaches, the EPD spokesman reminded members of the public that water quality could be temporarily affected during and after periods of heavy rain. Bathers should avoid swimming at beaches for up to three days after a tropical cyclone or heavy rainfall.

     A summary of beach grades is published weekly before the weekend. The latest beach grades based on the most current data may be obtained from the EPD’s website on Beach Water Quality (www.epd.gov.hk/epd/beach) or the beach hotline, 2511 6666. Members of the public can also obtain the latest daily water quality forecast information for all beaches that are open for swimming through the Beach Water Quality Forecast mobile application (available for download from: www.epd.gov.hk/en/BWQApp) or the dedicated beach water quality forecast page (www.epd.gov.hk/en/BWQForecast) on the EPD’s beach thematic website. read more

13 persons arrested during anti-illegal worker operations (with photo)

     The Immigration Department (ImmD) mounted a series of territory-wide anti-illegal worker operations codenamed “Twilight”, and joint operations with the Hong Kong Police Force codenamed “Champion” and “Windsand”, for four consecutive days from March 18 to yesterday (March 21). A total of eight suspected illegal workers, three suspected employers and two overstayers were arrested.
      
     During the anti-illegal worker operations, ImmD Task Force officers raided nine target locations including premises under renovation and restaurants. Three suspected illegal workers and two suspected employers were arrested. The arrested suspected illegal workers comprised two men and one woman, aged 36 to 47. Among them, one woman was suspected of using and being in possession of a forged Hong Kong identity card. One man and one woman, aged 48 and 53, were suspected of employing the illegal workers and were also arrested.
      
     During operation “Champion”, enforcement officers raided 80 target locations in Hung Hom, Kowloon City and Western Districts. Five suspected illegal workers, one suspected employer and two overstayers were arrested. The arrested suspected illegal workers comprised three men and two women, aged 42 to 57. Among them, one man was a holder of recognisance form, which prohibits him from taking any employment. In addition, two men were also suspected of using and being in possession of forged Hong Kong identity cards. One woman, aged 46, was suspected of employing the illegal worker and was arrested. Two female overstayers, aged 27 and 28, were also arrested. Among them, three suspected illegal workers, one suspected employer and two overstayers were handled by the ImmD.
          
     An ImmD spokesman said, “Any person who contravenes a condition of stay in force in respect of him or her shall be guilty of an offence. Also, visitors are not allowed to take employment in Hong Kong, whether paid or unpaid, without the permission of the Director of Immigration. Offenders are liable to prosecution and upon conviction face a maximum fine of $50,000 and up to two years’ imprisonment. Aiders and abettors are also liable to prosecution and penalties.”
      
     The spokesman warned, “As stipulated in section 38AA of the Immigration Ordinance, an illegal immigrant, a person who is the subject of a removal order or a deportation order, an overstayer or a person who was refused permission to land is prohibited from taking any employment, whether paid or unpaid, or establishing or joining in any business. Offenders are liable upon conviction to a maximum fine of $50,000 and up to three years’ imprisonment. Under the prevailing laws, it is an offence to use or possess a forged Hong Kong identity card or a Hong Kong identity card related to another person. Offenders are liable to prosecution and upon conviction face a maximum fine of $100,000 and up to 10 years’ imprisonment.”
      
     The spokesman reiterated that it is a serious offence to employ people who are not lawfully employable. Under the Immigration Ordinance, the maximum penalty for an employer employing a person who is not lawfully employable, i.e. an illegal immigrant, a person who is the subject of a removal order or a deportation order, an overstayer or a person who was refused permission to land, has been significantly increased from a fine of $350,000 and three years’ imprisonment to a fine of $500,000 and 10 years’ imprisonment to reflect the gravity of such offences. The director, manager, secretary, partner, etc, of the company concerned may also bear criminal liability. The High Court has laid down sentencing guidelines that the employer of an illegal worker should be given an immediate custodial sentence.
      
     According to the court sentencing, employers must take all practicable steps to determine whether a person is lawfully employable prior to employment. Apart from inspecting a prospective employee’s identity card, the employer has the explicit duty to make enquiries regarding the person and ensure that the answers would not cast any reasonable doubt concerning the lawful employability of the person. The court will not accept failure to do so as a defence in proceedings. It is also an offence if an employer fails to inspect the job seeker’s valid travel document if the job seeker does not have a Hong Kong permanent identity card. Offenders are liable upon conviction to a maximum fine of $150,000 and to imprisonment for one year. In that connection, the spokesman would like to remind all employers not to defy the law by employing illegal workers. The ImmD will continue to take resolute enforcement action to combat such offences.
      
     Under the existing mechanism, the ImmD will, as a standard procedure, conduct an initial screening of vulnerable persons, including illegal workers, illegal immigrants, sex workers and foreign domestic helpers, who are arrested during any operation with a view to ascertaining whether they are trafficking in persons (TIP) victims. When any TIP indicator is revealed in the initial screening, the ImmD officers will conduct a full debriefing and identification by using a standardised checklist to ascertain the presence of TIP elements, such as threats and coercion in the recruitment phase and the nature of exploitation. Identified TIP victims will be provided with various forms of support and assistance, including urgent intervention, medical services, counselling, shelter or temporary accommodation and other supporting services. The ImmD calls on TIP victims to report crimes to the relevant departments immediately.

Photo  
read more

Income and asset limits for public rental housing for 2024/25

The following is issued on behalf of the Hong Kong Housing Authority:
 
     The Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA)’s Subsidised Housing Committee (SHC) today (March 22) discussed the outcome of the review of income and asset limits for public rental housing (PRH) for 2024/25, and endorsed the proposed income and asset limits for applicants of different household sizes. The adjusted limits will take effect from April 1, 2024 (as detailed in Annex).
 
     “The PRH income and asset limits are reviewed annually according to the established mechanism. If an adjustment is to be made strictly in accordance with the established formula, the PRH income limits for 2024/25 for one-person and four-person households will be adjusted downwards, while those for households with two persons, three persons and five persons or above will be adjusted upwards,” a spokesman for the HA said.
 
     “Having regard to the current economic conditions, past practices in reviewing the income limits and the overall situation of the income limit adjustments, the SHC endorsed freezing the income limits for one-person and four-person households at the existing (2023/24) levels, while adjusting upwards the income limits for households with two persons, three persons and five persons or above in accordance with the established methodology. In addition, the SHC also endorsed adjusting the PRH asset limits upwards by three per cent for all household sizes in accordance with the established mechanism, the spokesman said.

     PRH income limits are derived using a household expenditure approach, which consists of housing costs and non-housing costs, plus a five per cent contingency provision. Housing costs, which measure the costs of renting a private flat comparable to PRH, depend on the differential unit rents of private accommodation per square metre and reference flat sizes (i.e. average space of flats allocated to PRH applicants in the past three years). Non-housing costs are determined with reference to the results of the latest Household Expenditure Survey conducted by the Census and Statistics Department, and adjusted in the intervening years by the latest movements in the Consumer Price Index (CPI)(A) (excluding housing costs), or the change in the nominal wage index as the income factor, whichever is higher. As regards the PRH asset limits, they are adjusted with reference to movements in the CPI(A) over the year. read more