Tag Archives: China

     The effective exchange rate index for the Hong Kong dollar on Wednesday, February 21, 2024 is 105.0 (down 0.1 against yesterday’s index). read more

     A girl who went missing in Sau Mau Ping has been located.      Chung Wing-man, aged 12, went missing after she left her residence in On Tat Estate on February 18 afternoon. Her family made a report to Police on February 19.      The … read more

     Following is a question by Professor the Hon Priscilla Leung and a written reply by the Acting Secretary for Health, Dr Libby Lee, in the Legislative Council today (February 21):

Question:

     According to the Hong Kong Mental Health Index Survey 2022 released by the Research Working Group of the “Mental Health Month 2022” Organising Committee, the mental health index for Hong Kong people has failed to reach the passing level for five consecutive years, with an average score of 47.64 in 2022, which is below the passing score of 52. In addition, the survey found that 15.3 per cent and 12.1 per cent of the respondents suffered from symptoms of anxiety and depressive disorders respectively. There are views that these figures reflect that Hong Kong society is facing a serious public mental health crisis. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) whether it has formulated and implemented comprehensive and effective mental health policies, and provided timely and appropriate support and services for members of the public in need, so as to prevent and reduce the occurrence of mental health problems; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(2) whether it has enhanced and improved education and publicity on mental health, so as to raise mental health awareness and literacy among members of the public, as well as to eliminate discrimination and stigma against patients with mental illnesses; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

(3) whether it has increased and improved the manpower and resources for mental health services, so as to meet the ever-increasing demands and expectations among members of the public, as well as to ensure the quality and accessibility of mental health services; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and

(4) whether it has regularly and systematically gathered and analysed information on the mental health status of members of the public and set indicators for such data, so as to monitor and evaluate mental health trends and problems among members of the public, and to adjust and improve mental health-related policies and measures in the light of the actual circumstances; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?

Reply:

President,

     The reply to the question raised by Professor the Hon Priscilla Leung is as follows:

(1) and (3) The Government attaches great importance to the mental health of the public, and comprehensive mental health involves various aspects including medical care. Therefore, the Government adopts an integrated approach to promote mental health, providing services that include prevention, early identification, as well as timely intervention, treatment and rehabilitation services for persons in need. Apart from promotion of self-care, primary healthcare and community support, the Government provides specialist and institutionalised services, and also multi-disciplinary and cross-sectoral services to persons with mental health needs through co-ordination and co-operation among the Health Bureau (HHB), the Labour and Welfare Bureau (LWB), the Education Bureau (EDB), the Department of Health (DH), the Social Welfare Department (SWD), the Hospital Authority (HA), non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and other stakeholders in the community.

     The Government published the Mental Health Review Report (Review Report) in 2017, putting forward a total of 40 recommendations on enhancing the overall mental health services covering 20 different areas, including promotion and education, research and studies, service capacity building and support services for persons of different age groups. To monitor the implementation of the recommendations of the Review Report, the Government set up the Advisory Committee on Mental Health (ACMH) in December 2017, comprising members from the healthcare, social service and education sectors, as well as lay persons with concerns over mental health, to advise the Government on mental health policies and assist the Government in formulating policies, strategies and measures to enhance the mental health services on all fronts.

     To meet the ever changing mental health needs of society, government bureaux and departments have all along been monitoring the implementation of the recommendations of the Review Report on the collaborative platform of the ACMH with various stakeholders, patient groups, professionals, academics and relevant institutions, etc, and have been allocating resources to further strengthen mental health services, such as the following key initiatives launched in recent years:

(i) The HA has enhanced manpower and optimised the ratio of case manager under the Case Management Programme to patients with severe mental illness to no higher than 1:40;

(ii) the HHB launched the “18111 – Mental Health Support Hotline” to provide one-stop, round-the-clock support for people with mental health needs, rendering immediate mental health support and referral services;

(iii) the HHB set up a service centre to provide emotional support and counselling services for ethnic minorities. Supported by a multi-professional team comprising social workers, counsellors and support staff conversant in ethnic minority languages, the service centre provides mental health support and counselling services to ethnic minorities and refers cases to other service platforms for additional support and/or treatment if needed;

(iv) the SWD will enhance the services of the Integrated Community Centres for Mental Wellness in 2024, including strengthening early identification of persons with mental health needs and early intervention, and scale up the training of social workers in community mental health service units to raise their capacity in handling complicated cases;
 
(v) the Government earmarked $300 million under the Beat Drugs Fund to implement the Mental Health Initiatives Funding Scheme to provide better support to the needy in the community and raise public awareness of mental health;

(vi) the HHB will launch a pilot scheme in three District Health Centres in 2024 in collaboration with community organisations to provide mental health assessments for those in need, and to provide early follow-up and referral for high-risk cases;

(vii) in terms of children’s and adolescents’ mental health, the HHB launched the Pilot Scheme on New Service Protocol for Child and Adolescent with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Comorbidity, providing multi-disciplinary assessment, treatment and support services for children and adolescents with or suspected of having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and comorbidity;
 
(viii) the Government implemented the Three-Tier School-based Emergency Mechanism through cross-departmental collaboration of the EDB, the HHB and the SWD to provide students with higher suicidal risk with support as early as possible, and has launched new measures to enhance the support for schools to identify students with higher suicidal risk early, such as organising training courses and workshops for schools to introduce related practical skills, counselling techniques and intervention strategies; and

(ix) in terms of elderly mental health, the SWD, in collaboration with the HA, launched the Dementia Community Support Scheme under a medical-social collaboration model to provide community support services to elderly persons aged 60 or above with mild or moderate dementia and their carers through District Elderly Community Centres.
 
(2) The Government spares no effort in mental health promotion and public education towards persons of different age groups. The ACMH launched the “Shall We Talk” mental health promotion and public education initiative in July 2020 to step up public engagement in promoting mental well-being; to enhance public awareness of mental health with a view to encouraging help-seeking and early intervention; and to reduce stigma towards people with mental health needs. The initiative includes (i) launching a one-stop mental health thematic website (shallwetalk.hk) to provide one-stop information and resources on mental health to the public and broadcasting videos on social media platforms, featuring the sharing of personal experiences and feelings by various stakeholders (including artists and key opinion leaders) to encourage the public to recognise mental health issues; (ii) broadcasting promotional videos on the television, the radio and other media; and (iii) organising tours in different districts and tertiary institutions to promote mental health messages.

     Moreover, the LWB organises the Mental Health Month annually in collaboration with various government departments, public organisations and NGOs providing community mental health support services to promote the messages of mental wellness and encourage the public’s acceptance of persons in mental recovery. The SWD also sets up the Mobile Van for Publicity Service on Mental Wellness to promote public awareness of mental wellness and develop positive help-seeking attitudes/behaviours.

     Furthermore, the Student Health Service of the DH delivers health promotion activities to Secondary 1 to 3 students through the Adolescent Health Programme, including basic life skills training, stress management, interpersonal skills and problem-solving skills, to enhance their psychosocial health and ability to cope with challenges during their growth. The EDB will also launch the “Mental Health Literacy” resource kit for senior primary and lower secondary levels in the 2023/24 school year and prepare the launch of resource kit for lower primary and senior secondary levels, so as to cultivate students’ mental health literacy from a young age, proactively enhance students’ awareness of mental health and assist schools in promoting mental health.

(4) The DH conducts regular territory-wide population health survey, which includes the collection of data on self-reported and doctor-diagnosed mental health issues from respondents. The Student Health Service of the DH also covers mental health-related assessments. Through clinical examinations and questionnaire screenings, individual students are assessed/referred based on aspects such as their psychosocial behaviours, and relevant data are taken into account in adjusting the health messages and service arrangements for students. These surveys are conducted on a regular basis and are effective in providing information for continuous assessment of the mental health status of the public.

     Furthermore, on the recommendation of the ACMH, the Government commissioned the University of Hong Kong and the Chinese University of Hong Kong to conduct three mental health surveys in 2019, covering children and adolescents aged 6 to 17, youth aged 15 to 24, and elderly people aged 60 or above to collect data on the mental health status of the Hong Kong population. The three surveys were completed in 2023 and the survey findings have been released. In collaboration with the relevant government bureaux and departments, the HHB will proactively follow up on the survey reports and the recommendations made by the ACMH, and fully utilise the data obtained from the surveys to formulate comprehensive and targeted policies and support measures, with a view to enhancing the mental health of different age groups in society. The Government will consult the ACMH in a timely manner to consider the need and methodology for conducting longitudinal surveys in the future. read more

     Following is a question by the Hon Gary Zhang and a reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Mr Lam Sai-hung, in the Legislative Council today (February 21):

Question: 

     In order to alleviate the problem of congestion at road tunnels, the Government launched the HKeToll, the “633” fixed toll plan (the “633” plan) and the time-varying toll plan respectively last year. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

(1) of the respective average daily total vehicular flows of each of the three road harbour crossings (the three RHCs) before and after the implementation of the “633” plan and the time-varying toll plan; whether it has studied if the travelling modes of members of the public have changed due to the implementation of these two plans;

(2) of the respective average percentages of the vehicular flows of each of the three RHCs during the morning and evening peak hours to the daily total vehicular flow before and after the implementation of the “633” plan and the time-varying toll plan; whether it has assessed if the effectiveness of these two plans on diverting the traffic has met the policy objectives and expectations; and

(3) whether it has assessed if the actual vehicular flows and traffic speeds of various road tunnels have increased after the implementation of HKeToll; if it has assessed and the outcome indicates that they have increased, of the details; if they have not increased, the reasons for that?

Reply:

President,

     To rationalise cross-harbour traffic and better utilise the tunnel capacity, the Government adjusted in phases in 2023 the toll levels of the three road harbour crossings (RHC), namely the Western Harbour Crossing (WHC), the Cross Harbour Tunnel (CHT) and the Eastern Harbour Crossing (EHC), such that motorists would be able to adapt to the toll adjustments in a gradual manner. The Transport Department (TD) has been closely monitoring the traffic condition following the implementation of the new tolls. With adjustments to commuting patterns made by motorists in a co-operative manner, the new tolls have been shown to be effective and the overall traffic queue and congestion at the portals of the RHCs have been alleviated.

     My reply to the question raised by the Hon Gary Zhang is as follows:

(1) Upon the takeover of the WHC on August 2, 2023, the Government implemented, as the first step, the “633” fixed toll plan at the three RHCs, i.e. the toll for private cars using the WHC was reduced by 20 per cent to $60 and those for the CHT and the EHC were adjusted to $30; while an all-day uniform toll of $25 was charged for cross-harbour taxis. The “633” fixed toll plan was an interim measure with a view to reducing the toll differentials among the three RHCs, allowing motorists to progressively adapt to the new tolling arrangement. After the implementation of the “633” fixed toll plan, the weekday daily cross-harbour traffic flow was maintained at about 260 000 vehicles (two-way), which was similar to the traffic flow prior to its implementation. The distribution of traffic at the three RHCs is as follows: the traffic flow at the WHC increased by approximately 18 per cent to about 79 000 vehicles (two-way); those at the CHT decreased by approximately 6 per cent to about 105 000 vehicles (two-way); and those at the EHC remained more or less the same at about 76 000 vehicles (two-way). The outcome is in line with the Government’s expectation. Details are at Appendix 1.

     Following the further resumption of normalcy of social and economic activities, the weekday daily cross-harbour traffic flow at the RHCs rose to about 270 000 vehicles (two-way) in December 2023, which was comparable to the level before the pandemic (i.e. 2019). In the next stage, the Government has implemented time-varying tolls since December 17, 2023 in order to suppress and divert cross-habour traffic during peak periods, thereby further improving the cross-harbour traffic.

     Under time-varying tolls, the tolls for private cars and motorcycles vary according to the time slots. On weekdays, the tolls for private cars range from $20 to $60. Taxis continue to be charged an all-day uniform toll of $25 while other commercial vehicles, including goods vehicles and buses, are charged an all-day uniform toll of $50.

     After the implementation of time-varying tolls, the weekday daily cross-harbour traffic flow in January 2024 maintained at about 270 000 vehicles (two-way), which was on par with the level prior to its implementation. The distribution of traffic at the three RHCs is as follows: the traffic flow at the WHC increased by 12 per cent to about 100 000 vehicles (two-way), while those at the CHT and the EHC decreased by 11 per cent to about 95 000 vehicles (two-way) and by 8 per cent to about 73 000 vehicles (two-way) respectively. Details are at Appendix 2.
     â€‹
     The above situation is in line with the Government’s expectation of making more efficient use of the tunnel capacity of the three RHCs and rationalising the uneven distribution of cross-harbour traffic due to the toll differentials in the past.

(2) According to our data, the proportions of the peak period traffic flow to the daily traffic flow of the three RHCs before and after the implementation of “633” fixed toll plan as well as after the implementation of time-varying tolls were as follows: 41 per cent, 41 per cent and 39 per cent for the WHC; 31 per cent, 31 per cent and 33 per cent for the CHT; and 38 per cent, 39 per cent and 40 per cent for the EHC respectively. Among them, the increase in the proportion of peak period traffic at the CHT and the EHC was mainly due to a different base with greater reduction in off-peak traffic for both tunnels. Previously, the whole-day traffic (including during off-peak hours) at the CHT and the EHC remained at a high level, whereas the capacity of the WHC outside the peak periods was not fully utilised. The new tolls have started to rationalise the unevenly distributed traffic among the three RHCs in the past.

     To further evaluate the effectiveness of time-varying tolls, the TD has analysed the overall cross-harbour traffic volume and the queue length during peak periods. In January 2024, the overall traffic at the three RHCs during peak periods decreased by about 3 per cent on average. During the half-hour time span immediately before or after the peak periods, the overall cross-harbour traffic was up about 4 per cent on average. This shows that some motorists have chosen to commute outside the peak periods, in other words, opting to cross the harbour at a lower toll level.

     â€‹As regards traffic queues, during peak periods, the queues at the CHT and the EHC reduced by more than 1 kilometre and 0.5km respectively. Outside peak periods, which accounted for nearly 80 per cent of the time of a day, the traffic at the three RHCs was generally smooth (including the CHT where congestion used to occur very often). Non-cross-harbour traffic near the portals of the RHCs has also significantly improved.

     The above preliminary data show that the new tolls have achieved the policy objectives of rationalising the cross-harbour traffic and better utilising the tunnel capacity, and thus bringing benefits to private car motorists, the public transportation trade, the commercial vehicle trade, cross-harbour bus passengers, and the community as a whole.

(3) The HKeToll free-flow tolling service enables motorists to pay tolls remotely using toll tags, without having to stop or queue up at toll booths for payment. This saves time and efforts for motorists, hence delivering a smoother driving experience for them, whilst reducing weaving near the toll booths and thus improving the general traffic around the toll plazas.

     The overall tunnel traffic flow after the implementation of HKeToll remained generally the same as before. For tunnels with traffic demand exceeding their capacity during peak periods, generally speaking, there has not been any significant change in the overall car journey speed as a result of the implementation of HKeToll.

     Thank you, President. read more

     Following is a question by the Hon Leung Man-kwong and a reply by the Secretary for Housing, Ms Winnie Ho, in the Legislative Council today (February 21):
 
Question:
 
     The Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA) has indicated that among the cases of suspected breach of the live-in requirements for subsidised sale flats (SSFs) it handled recently, a case involved a flat which had been resold and its owner had surrendered to the HA all the profits earned from the resale of the flat. In addition, it has been reported that in the past, there were a number of cases in which SSF owners resold their “unmodified flats”. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
 
(1) of the number of cases of suspected breach of the live-in requirements for SSFs followed by reselling such flats which are being followed up by the HA, and whether the HA will consider setting up a reporting mechanism;
 
(2) for SSF owners breaching the live-in requirements for SSFs followed by reselling their flats, in addition to requiring such owners to surrender all the profits earned, whether the Government has other ways to follow up and whether it will consider increasing the penalties; and
 
(3) for SSFs bought first-hand which have not been occupied and renovated, whether the Government will consider stepping up efforts to provide guidelines for real estate intermediaries in respect of handling the purchase and sale of such flats?
 
Reply:
 
President,
 
     To ensure proper utilisation of precious and limited public housing resources, owners of subsidised sale flats (SSFs) are required to comply with the live-in requirements. According to the Agreement for Sale and Purchase (ASP) made between the owner of SSF for the purchase of the flat and the Hong Kong Housing Authority (HA), the flat concerned shall be occupied by the owner and all members of the family named in the Application Form for the purchase of the flat. If the owner or any family member ceases to actually or permanently live in the flat without the prior written consent of the HA, the HA has the right to require the owner to assign the flat back to the HA at the costs and expenses of the owner.
 
     The HA has been taking stringent follow-up actions on cases of suspected breaches of the live-in requirements and complaints received. The HA will take appropriate actions after investigation and considering the circumstances of each case. If the owner is found to have breached any of the concerned requirements, the HA will not approve the application from the parties concerned for the issuance of a Certificate of Availability for Sale (CAS) under the Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) Secondary Market Scheme (SMS). Even if a CAS has been issued, the HA also has the right to revoke the CAS so that the owner concerned will not be able to sell the flat under the SMS. At the same time, purchasers should also note that if the original owner is in breach of the live-in requirements, the HA will not issue the Letter of Nomination in respect of the flat concerned, and both the purchaser and vendor will need to bear the risk that the sale and purchase cannot be completed.
 
     Having regard to the special circumstances of some individual cases, e.g. the owner is hospitalised due to sickness or has to take care of a family member with serious health problems, rendering it impracticable for him to handle decoration and removal issues, the HA may withhold the enforcement actions for non-compliance of the requirements under the ASP and at the same time require the owner to move in the flat concerned within 60 days from the date of the HA’s notification in order to comply with the requirements under the ASP. The HA will also monitor the live-in condition of the flat concerned to ensure that the breach has been remedied.
 
     Amongst some recent cases, there was a flat which was being resold in the Secondary Market and the owner was in breach of the live-in requirements. According to the ASP, the HA has the right to require the owner to assign the flat back to the HA. After receiving the demand from the HA to buy back the flat concerned, the owner had on his volition proposed to surrender to the HA all the profits obtained from the sale of the flat, and the HA accepted the proposal in handling the matter after considering the specific circumstances of the case, including minimising the impact on the uninformed purchaser.
 
     Apart from the follow-up actions on suspected cases and complaints, the HA has also reminded stakeholders of the requirements concerned through various channels. For owners, the live-in requirements have been set out in the application guide and the ASP of relevant sale exercises. Applicants of SSFs are required to sign a declaration at the time of flat selection to declare and undertake that they will notify all the members of the family named in the application form to comply with the live-in requirements. Owners of SSFs are fully aware that they are required to comply with the live-in requirements. Recently, the HA has also sent a letter to owners who have recently been issued with a CAS reminding them of the live-in requirements. In addition, in the press release issued last month in respect of the flat selection arrangements for HOS 2023, the HA had specifically reminded the owners, purchasers and licensees for estate agency work of the requirements concerned. The Housing Department (HD) will continue to step up publicity and remind stakeholders, including setting out the details of the live-in requirements in sales/application documents, HA/HD’s designated websites, flat selection letter, notice for completion of sale and purchase, letters related to the application for a CAS, etc.
 
     In addition, the HA is maintaining a close liaison with the Estate Agents Authority (EAA) on this matter. The EAA had issued a letter to its licensees on January 26, 2024 to remind again all licensees not to participate in any sale of SSFs where the owners have breached the live-in requirements. The EAA also reminds agents and educates the industry to act cautiously and prudently, as well as be mindful of the live-in requirements in handling transactions concerning SSFs; otherwise they may be subject to disciplinary actions, including admonishment, reprimand, fine, suspension of licence or even revocation of licence, etc. If an estate agent participates in the sale of a flat and the purchaser subsequently suffers from losses or damages because of the breach of the live-in requirements by the owner, the estate agent concerned may be sued by the purchaser in civil actions for failing to exercise due care and due diligence to protect the purchaser’s interest. The EAA will also keep a watch out for advertisements issued by licensees regarding SSFs, and spot check whether suspected breaches of the live-in requirements of SSFs are involved. If the HA discovers cases breaching the live-in requirements and the involved estate agents are suspected of breaching EAA’s Code of Ethics, the EAA will conduct follow-up investigations.
 
     I reiterate that SSF owners must comply with the terms and conditions as set out in the ASP entered into with the HA for the purchase of the flats. Once again, I would like to remind purchasers and vendors of SSFs and estate agents that they should be careful and mindful about the concerned requirements.
 
     Thank you, President. read more