image_pdfimage_print

Author Archives: GovWorldMag

Theresa May’s boast that the NHS is the best prepared it’s ever been has now been entirely discredited – Ashworth

Jonathan Ashworth MP, Labour’s Shadow Health Secretary, responding to today’s NHS England stats, said:

“These figures reveal the shocking scale of the crisis in our NHS this winter. Over 75,000 patients have been left languishing in the back of ambulances this winter, something the Government should be deeply ashamed of.

“Labour and clinicians have warned Ministers for months to prepare for this winter, but concerns were casually dismissed out of hand. Theresa May’s boast that the NHS is the best prepared it’s ever been has now been entirely discredited.

“The truth is we are now approaching the 8th year of desperate underfunding and cuts to our health and social care services by the Tories. We’ve seen thousands of beds cut from the NHS and the numbers of days lost to delayed discharge are up by 50% since 2010.

“The NHS is being pushed to the brink under Theresa May and it is patients suffering as a consequence.”

read more

Greens call for 10:1 pay ratio on Fat Cat Day

4 January 2018

The Green Party has called for a 10:1 pay ratio between chief executives and their workers after news top bosses still earn 120 times more than the average worker.

Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, made the call on Fat Cat Day (Thursday 4 January), the day top bosses will have already made more than the typical full-time worker in the UK will earn in a year [1].

Bartley branded a fall in FTSE 100 chief executive pay, from a ratio of 122:1 last year, “a drop in the ocean” in the face of the inequality facing workers.

Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, said:

“It’s not right that company bosses take home fat cat salaries while their workers struggle to make ends meet. It’s good to see chief executive pay falling but this is a drop in the ocean when compared to the scale of inequality with workers. Lower pay ratios benefit companies and their workers. We need a 10:1 ratio to readdress inequality and create a world of work where everyone has a stake.”   

Notes:

  1. http://highpaycentre.org/blog/its-fat-cat-day-thursday-jan-4-2018

Tweet

Back to main news page

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

read more

We have a nationalised railway in all but name

There seems to be a widespread misunderstanding about our railway. The tracks, signals and stations are all in public ownership and are run as a nationalised industry. The private sector train companies bid for a monopoly franchise on a single route, and have to meet detailed specifications for timetables and services laid down by the government and rail regulators. There is little scope for competition, innovation or adventurous uses of private capital.

The great frustration of some commuters with their rail service is understandable. Some lines are badly affected by poor labour relations leading to a series of strikes which interrupt the service. Many lines are suffering from a  lack of capacity, as the nationalised rail company is unable to provide the capacity commuters need on busy routes to the train operating companies. Train operating companies would often be willing to run more peak time trains if only there was line capacity to do so.

That is why I have been urging the nationalised Network Rail for some time to adopt better signalling systems that would allow more trains to run on the same track compared to the 20 an hour which is the common experience with today’s signals. If they adopted new  systems that allowed 30 trains an hour we could enjoy a 50% increase in seat capacity and trains running for a modest outlay of public investment.

The idea that we should complete the nationalisation of  the railways means cancelling the train operating franchises, probably as they expire, and arranging finance to buy up trains to run as the train operations rejoin track provision and maintenance in the public sector. This would impose an additional  financing strain on the state, but would not lead to much change in train services. As the timetables, fare regulation and the provision of the bulk of the railway assets is already in state hands it is difficult to see there would be much change for passengers. How would a nationalised railway resolve the disputes with employees that currently disrupt some of the private sector franchises? At least the periodic advertisement of franchises provides some modest competitive stimulus to better performance that would disappear with a wholly nationalised monopoly.

Network Rail last year (to March 2017) lost £990  million. Its outstanding borrowings were £47bn on a small equity base.

read more